Search This Blog

Sunday, 29 January 2012

پروفیسرفوادسیزگین: اسلام کی علمی روایات کے امین


 پروفیسرفوادسیزگین: اسلام کی علمی روایات کے امین

ڈاکٹرغطریف شہباز ندوی ٭

بیسویں صدی مسلمانوں کے سیاسی وعلمی عروج وزوال کی صدی رہی ہے۔اس صدی کے پہلے نصف میں مسلمانان عالم علمی وتحقیقی اورسیاسی ومعاشی زوال کی انتہاکو پہنچ رہے تھے ،وہیں اسی صدی کے نصف ثانی میں انہوںنے علمی وتحقیقی میدان میں عروج وارتقاءکی ایک دوسری داستان لکھی چنانچہ جہاںبہت سارے مسلم ممالک نے استعمارکے چنگل سے نجات پائی ،وہیںفکروتحقیق کے میدان میں بہت سے لوگ پیداہوئے جنہوں نے علم وتحقیق ،تصنیف وتالیف اوربحث ورسرچ کی ان تابندہ روایات کو پھرسے زندہ کیاجو کبھی اسلاف کا طرہ امتیاز ہواکرتی تھیں۔ان بڑی اورعظیم محقق شخصیات میں ڈاکٹرمحمدحمیداللہ ،(پیرس) کے علاوہ پروفیسرفوادسیزگین وغیرہ جیسی شخصیات بھی ہیں جن کو علوم اسلامیہ کے میدان میں نمایاں خدمات انجام دینے پر فیصل ایوارڈ سے نوازاگیا۔اگلی سطورمیں انہیںڈاکٹرفوادسیزگین (ترکی ) کا مختصرتعارف کرانامقصودہے۔البتہ ان کے گھریلوحالات راقم کو تلاش کے باوجود نہیں مل سکے۔

فواد سیزگین (Fuat Sezgin)چوبیس اکتوبر1924کو ترکی کے مقام بطلس میں پیداہوئے ۔ابتدائی تعلیم وتربیت اپنے علاقہ میںپانے کے بعدوہ استنبول آگئے ،جہاںانہوںنے جامعہ استنبول میں داخلہ لیااور1947میں انہوںنے اس کی فیکلٹی آف آرٹس سے گریجویشن کیااوریہیں سے اےم اے کیا۔اورعربی زبان وادبیات میں 1954میں اسی یونیورسٹی سے پی ایچ ڈی کی ۔جس کے نگراں جامعہ استنبول میں اسلامی علوم اورعربی ادبیات کے ماہر ایک جرمن مستشرق پروفیسرہیلمٹ رٹر(Hellmut Ritter)تھے۔رٹراپنے اس شاگردپر بہت شفقت کرتے تھے ۔ان کے مشورہ سے پی ایچ ڈی کے مقالہ کے لیے فواد سیزگین نے بخاری کے مصادرکا موضوع منتخب کیا۔
مصادربخاری پر اپنے تحقیقی کام میں انہوںنے ثابت کیاہے کہ امام بخاری ؒنے مکتوبہ ومدونہ مصادرومراجع پر اعتمادکیاہے نہ کہ صرف زبانی روایات اورمراجع پر جیساکے مشہورعام ہے۔پی ایچ ڈی کے بعد فواد سیزگین اسی یونیورسٹی میں ایسوسی ایٹ پروفیسرہوگئے ۔ان سے قریبی زمانہ میں ایک اورمشہورجرمن مستشرق کارل بروکلمن نے عربی اوراسلامی ادبیات پر تاریخ آداب اللغة العربیہ کے نام سے ایک مبسوط کام کیاتھا۔گرچہ کارل بروکلمن ترکی آتے جاتے رہتے تھے مگرمعلوم ہوتاہے کہ مشرقی اورمسلمان علماءسے ان کا کبھی انٹرایکشن یاتبادلہ خیال نہیں ہوا،کیونکہ ان کی کتاب یوں تو بہت تحقیقی ،مستنداورجامع سمجھی جاتی ہے مگراس میں صرف یوروپی مصادرومراجع سے کام لیاگیاہے اورمسلمان علما کی کتابوں کا کوئی ذکراذکارنہیں ہے ۔کتاب کے اس خلاءکے باعث وہ ناتمام کتاب ہے اوراس خلاءکوپر کرنے کی یوروپی اسکالروں نے کئی کوششیں کی ہیں۔چنانچہ 1950میں اس کتاب کی تکمیل اورکمیوںکی تلافی کا کام کئی محققین کی ایک ٹیم نے مل کرکیااوراس منصوبہ کو UNISCOنے فنڈفراہم کیانیز برل پبلشنگ نے اس کی اشاعت کی ذمہ داری لی ۔اس طرح یہ کام پہلے سے بہترتوہوگیامگرابھی بہت کچھ اصلاح کی ضرورت باقی تھی ۔کارل بروکلمن کی اس کتاب کا مطالعہ بالاستیعاب جب فوادسیزگین نے کیاتو اس کے نقائص ان پر اچھی طرح واضح ہوگئے اورانہوںنے تلافی مافات کے لیے کمرکس لی ۔ان کی مشہورعالم کتاب تاریخ التراث العربی(عربوںکی میراث علمی کی تاریخ) اسی طرح منصہ شہودپر آئی ۔یہ کتابی سلسلہ ابھی جاری ہے اس کی پندرہ جلدیں طبع ہوچکی ہیںاوردوپر وہ کام کررہے ہیں ۔پوری کتاب سترہ جلدوں میں آئے گی ۔فوادسیزگین مطالعہ وتحقیق کے آدمی ہیں اوراسی کے لیے وقف ۔اپنے استادوں میں انہوںنے پرفیسررٹرکا اثرسب سے زیادہ قبول کیاہے۔جنہوںنے ان کو مشورہ دیاتھاکہ اگر”وہ واقعی اسکالربنناچاہتے ہیں تو ان کو سترہ گھنٹے یومیہ پڑھناچاہےے“۔انہوںنے استادکی اس بات کو گرہ سے باندھ لیااورآج تک اس پر عمل پیراہیں ۔اورآج بیاسی سال کی عمرمیں بھی وہ چودہ گھنٹے کام کرتے ہیں۔رٹرسے ملاقات کو وہ اپنی زندگی کا اہم موڑمانتے ہیںاوراسے The time when I was born again(ایسالمحہ جب میں دوبارہ پیداہوا)کہاکرتے ہیں۔ایک دن انہوںنے رٹرسے معلوم کیاکہ کیاعربوںاورمسلمانوںکی تاریخ میں ریاضیات کے میدان میں کوئی بڑانام نہیںہے؟رٹرکوحالانکہ یہی پڑھایاگیاتھاکہ مسلمان اورعرب ایک جاہل قوم ہیں اورانسانی تاریخ میں ان کاکوئی بڑاکارنامہ نہیں۔مگررٹرایک منصف مزاج آدمی تھے انہوںنے فوادسیزگین کو بتایاکہ ایک نہیں کئی کئی بڑے نام ہیں۔بس پھرکیاتھا ان کے دل کو ےہ بات لگ گئی اورانہوںنے اس موضوع پر مطالعہ وتحقیق شروع کردی ۔جس کا نتیجہ ان کی کتاب Natural Sciences in Islamہے ۔یہ کتا ب پانچ جلدوںمیں ہے اوراس میں انہوںنے سائنسی علوم میں مسلمانوں اورعربوںکے کارناموں کونہایت مستندمصادرومراجع کی بنیادپر بیان کیاہے۔رسرچ وتحقیق کے لیے وہ انہوںنے جرمنی کا سفربھی کیا۔
فوادسیزگین ترکی کی جامعہ استنبول میں پڑھارہے تھے کہ 27مئی 1960میں ملک میں فوجی بغاوت ہوگئی اورنئی حکومت نے بغیرکسی سبب کے یونیورسٹی کے 147پروفیسروںکو برخواست کردیا۔اگرچہ ان کے دوچھوٹے بھائیوں کو بھی حراست میں لے لیاگیاتھا مگرسیزگین نے اس کے باوجودیونیورسٹی میں اپنے فرائض انجام دینے جاری رکھے۔ایک دن وہ صبح صبح یونیورسٹی جارہے تھے کہ ہاکرنے ان کو اخبارپکڑادیاجس میں یہ خبرتھی کہ نئی حکومت نے یونیورسٹی کے 147پروفیسروںکو برخواست کردیاہے۔اس بارے میں وہ لکھتے ہیں: میں ترکی چھوڑنانہیں چاہتاتھامگراس کے علاوہ میرے پاس کوئی آپشن نہیں بچاتھا”وہ یہ خبرپڑھ کرسلیمانیہ لائبریری گئے اوروہاں بیٹھ کرامریکہ اوریوروپ میں اپنے دوستوںکو خطوط لکھے کہ نئے حالات میں ترکی میں رہ کران کے لیے کام کرناممکن نہیں رہا،کیاوہ ان کو کوئی موقع دیں گے ۔ایک ماہ کے اندراندرکئی جگہوں سے مثبت جواب آئے ۔انہوںنے جرمنی کی فرینکفرٹ یونیورسٹی جاناپسندکیا۔جہاں وہ اس سے پہلے بھی کئی بارجاچکے تھے ۔جس دن ان کو روانہ ہوناتھا اس کے بارے میں وہ بہت جزباتی ہوگئے ،لکھتے ہیں: ترکی سے اپنی روانگی کی شام میں ”گلاتابرج کے قراقوے“ (استنبول کا ساحلی علاقہ )کی جانب گیا۔میں 15,20منٹ تک ”اوسکدار“(استنبول کی ایک گنجان آبادمیونسپلٹی) کو دیکھتارہا۔یہ رات بڑی خوبصورت تھی مگرمیرے آنسوبہ رہے تھے ،میں ناراض نہیں مگرغم زدہ ضرورتھا۔“
اس کے بعد وہ وہ جرمنی چلے گئے اور1962سے فرینکفرٹ یونیورسٹی میں وزٹنگ لیکچرارکی حیثیت سے کام شروع کردیا۔1965میں انہوںنے عرب سائنس کی تاریخ پر پھرپی ایچ ڈی کی اوراسی سال اپنی وہ مشہورکتاب لکھنی شروع کی جس کا ذکراوپرآچکاہے ۔یہ کتا ب انہوںنے جرمن میں لکھی جس کا نام ہے: Geschechte des arabischen shehrefttrmsاس کتاب کا موضوع اسلامی علوم کی تاریخ ہے جس کا انگریزی نام ہے :History of Arabi-Islamic sciences and technology in the Islamic world اردومیں اسے اسلامی عربی سائنسی وٹیکنالوجی کے علوم کی تاریخ کہیں گے ۔اس کا عربی ترجمہ ہوچکاہے اورمتداول ہے ۔اوراسی کی بنیادپر ان کو فیصل ایوارڈ کے لیے منتخب کیاگیا۔اس کی پہلی جلدمیں عربی واسلامی علوم ہیں جن میں مذہبی علوم بھی شامل ہیں۔1970میں اس کی دوسری جلد شائع ہوئی جس میںطبی علوم سے بحث کی گئی ہے۔1971میں تیسری جلدآئی جس میں علم کیمیا،کیمسٹری جیسے علوم ہیں،چوتھی جلد1974میں آئی جس میں ریاضی ہندسہ اورہیئت فلکیات ،علم نجوم وغیرہ علوم کا ذکرہے۔1978میں اس کی وہ جلدمنظرعام پر آئی جس میں شاعری ،عروض،نحووصرف اوربلاغت اوردوسرے لغوی علوم کا تذکرہ ہے۔یہ کتابی سلسلہ ابھی جاری ہے۔اس کتاب کی اہمیت اوراستنادکامرتبہ یہ کہ پاکستان کے ایک بڑے اسکالراوردانشورڈاکٹرمحموداحمدغازی نے کہاتھاکہ” یہ کتاب اس قابل ہے کہ اس کے براہ راست مطالعہ کے لیے جرمن زبان سیکھ لی جائے“(ملاحظہ ہوماہنامہ الشریعہ کی خصوصی اشاعت بیادڈاکٹرمحموداحمدغازی جنوری فروری ۲۰۱۱الشریعہ اکادمی گوجرانوالہ پاکستان )
پروفیسرفوادسیزگین ا ب دنیاکے ایک بڑے تحقیقی ادارے Institute of Historical Arab-Islamic Sciesnes at John wolfgang Goethe Univirsity Frankfurt Garmanyکے بانی وصدرہیںاوراسی یونیورسٹی میں Natural scienesمیں پروفیسرآف امیرٹس ۔یہ ادارہ عرب مسلم تاریخی کلچرپر رسرچ وتحقیق کرتاہے۔سیزگین کہتے ہیںکہ مسلم سائنس کا دورعروج آٹھویں صدی عیسوی سے سولھوی صدی تک رہاہے ۔یوروپی اسکالر آج سیزگین کو Conqueror of a missing treasure(مخفی خزانہ کا فاتح )کہتے ہیں۔کیونکہ انہوںنے مغرب کے قرون مظلمہ(یعنی اسلامی دور)کے تصورکو غلط ثابت کردیاہے اوربتایاہے کہ آج کی ترقی یافتہ سائنس دراصل مسلمانوں اورعربوں کی ہی رسرچ وتحقیق کا ثمرہ ہے ۔اورقرون وسطی کے جن ادوارکو مغرب والے تاریک دورکہتے رہے ہیں وہ اسلامی سائنس کا عہدہے اوراس کو تاریک دورقراردیناجہالت اورتعصب ہے ۔اب وہ ایک اورکتاب پر کام کررہے ہیںجو پانچ جلدوںمیں ہوگی اورمسلم تاریخ کے مختلف گوشوں کااحاطہ کرے گی ۔
پروفیسرسیزگین روانی سے عربی ،ترکی ،انگریزی اورجرمن بولتے ہیں البتہ ان کی تحریری زبان جرمن ہے ۔آغاز میں وہ ترکی میں پڑھاتے تھے مگرجرمنی جانے کے بعدجلدہی انہوںنے جرمن پر عبورحاصل کرلیا۔انہوںنے اسلامی ٹیکنالوجی اورسائنس پر ایک میوزےم بھی بنایاہے جس میں مسلم سائنس کے نادرنمونے ،نقشے ،خریطے ،جدولیںاورسائنسی آلات واصطرلاب وغیرہ جمع کیے ہیں۔اس کے علاوہ وہ جرمنی اورترکی نیز مغرب میں مختلف جگہوں پر مسلم سائنس کی نمائش بھی لگاچکے ہیں۔اس کے علاوہ ایک ترکی مو ¿رخ زکی ولیدی طوغان کے ساتھ مل کر انہوںنے ترکی میں بھی Islamic Science Research Instituteقائم کیاہے۔انہوںنے مسلم نقشہ نویسوںپر بھی کام کیاہے اورساتویں صدی میں عرب اسلامی علوم اوران کے یونانی مصادرپر بھی ان کی گہری نظرہے اوراس موضوع پر وہ جرمن وترکش میں سینکڑوں مقالات تحریرکرچکے ہیں۔

فوادسیزگین جرمنی کے معروف مجلہ Journal for the History of Arab-Islamic Sciencesکے ایڈیٹربھی رہے ہیں۔ان کی تحقیق کے مطابق عرب سیاح اورملاح 1420میں ہی امریکہ پہنچ چکے تھے ۔مختلف نقشوں اورجغرافیائی خریطوںاورآ ثارقدیمہ کے نمونوںکے مطالعہ سے انہوںنے یہ بات ثابت کی ہے۔ان کو 1978میں علوم اسلامیہ کی خدمت کے سلسلہ میںعالم اسلام کا باوقارانعام فیصل ایوارڈ دیاگیا۔ان کے ساتھ ایوارڈ پانے والوںمیں مولانامودودی ؒ بھی تھے جنہیں اسی سال اسلامی خدمات کے لیے یہ ایوارڈ دیاگیاتھا۔فیصل ایوارڈ کے علاوہ ان کو جرمنی کا مشہورانعامThe great medal for distinguised sciences of the federal republic of Garmany بھی دیاگیا۔وہ ترکی اکیڈمی برائے علوم ،مجمع اللغة العربیہ ،دمشق ،قاہرہ ،اوربغدادکے ممبرہیں۔جن کا ممبرہوناایک اعزاز کی بات ہے ۔اس کے علاوہ اکیڈمی آف سائنس مراکش کے رکن ہیں۔اس طرح پروفیسرفوادسیزگین اسلامی وعربی علوم کے میدان میں ایک منارہ نورہیں اوراسلاف کی علمی روایتوںکے امین ،جن کے چراغ سے
کتنے ہی چراغ جلےں گے اورجن کی تابانی سے کتنے ہی نقوش روشن ہوں گے۔

Friday, 27 January 2012

Toward a Muslim Constructive Role In the Contemporary World Civilization

Toward a Muslim Constructive Role
In the Contemporary World Civilization
Dr. Fathi Osman*
What is a Civilization?
Without going through the variety of concepts and terminologies on the subject, civilization simply means: the comprehensive development of the human potential in all its dimensions: physical, intellectual, spiritual, moral and psychological. To achieve this potential, civilizations strive to develop, utilize, and conserve the natural resources, the benefits of which should fairly reach the whole society, and bring about positive effects on the whole world.
Given this definition, it is obvious that a civilization has certain requirements to deserve its name. After all, civilization is a collective effort by the whole society, and its benefits cannot be restricted to few individuals or be limited to certain groups. Civilization has to bear fruits to all members of society. Besides although civilization development may not affect all sides of society at the same level, it nonetheless, remains inclusive and comprehensive. Civilization therefore has to maintain continuation and duration, and it cannot be considered as such if it just emerged to disappear. Another merit of civilization is that it has the potential of spreading to other societies, and that it can be adapted when it influences others. This civilization merit is being felt enormously in our times of amazingly speedy transportation of persons and goods, and communication of information everywhere in the world.
A Muslim civilization, therefore, should not mean in any way a civilization restricted to the Muslims alone. What had been called a Muslim civilization in the past was developed and enjoyed by Muslims and non-Muslims all over the world, Arabs and non Arabs. It spread beyond the areas of Muslim peoples and lands wherever and whenever this was possible. Its contribution reached non-Muslim Europe through Spain and Sicily, and influenced the European Crusaders, who in medieval times, thought that they would meet savage barbarians in Jerusalem and its neighborhood. To their surprise they soon came to realize they were witnessing a civilization far better than what they had been seen in feudal Europe. More important, Muslim civilization was not always connected with military power. It continued to work one way or another in Muslim societies during times of military strength or military and political weakness.
What is Muslim Civilization?
Muslim civilization is characterized with certain moral values which are accepted and supported universally by humanity at large, and which are considered by Muslims and other believers in God to be divine commandments that ought to be respected and followed by such believers. In fact, these believers feel that the conduct of good goes beyond observance of the law, or the expectation of practical short-term benefits. They do so because they believe it is right and just. They believe in developing the individual’s social habit of doing the good things in life. These, in return, will result in individual peace, social harmony, welfare, and spiritual strength. The believer is sure about his/her commitment to God and is also accountable before Him in this life and in the eternal life thereafter.
* A prominent Islamic scholar living in the United States. Served as a professor in many universities in Muslim and Western countries. He has written extensively on Islam, Islamic thought and scholarship and has published several books, papers and commentaries in both the Arabic and English languages. Among his well-known contributions are: “Concepts of the Quran” and “Muslim Women in the Family and Society”.
Such an understanding of the value of what is “good” reaches an unmatchable depth in the heart and mind of the believer in God. The reason is that it is connected with and guarded by the faith. It also reaches an unmatchable width in its range, for it addresses whatever good for all people and all creations in this universe. The believer is keen and persistent to do the good, whether its results are soon felt or not, since he/she is looking always beyond the short term results of this life. What is “good” or “right” or “just” may have more extensive dimensions for the believer, but it is shared by all human minds in different ways and at different levels.
In the past, Muslim civilization was appreciated for these common dimensions and all its efforts in developing the universal moral values, not because it was related to those who had a certain belief system or follow a certain prophet. The Quran significantly calls “the good”: “what is known by all people to be acceptable (al-ma’ruf)”, and calls “the evil”: “what is known by all people to be rejectable (al-munkar)”. Both are related to the universal common sense and sound judgment.
Peoples, Muslims and non-Muslims, have enjoyed the benefits of the Muslim endowments “awqaf” system which has been known to include hospitals, clean water, education, residence, food, bathrooms, and financial aid for all those in need of any assistance. Those who cannot afford the cost of marriage- bachelor-male or female- may be helped to get married through awqaf. The benefits of awqaf have also reached the abandoned animals, especially those old and sick among them.
Through the institution of “hisba”, instant justice reached workers who had been unfairly treated with regard to the work assignments or unfair wages. It had even reached animals, regarding over-load carriage or mistreatment. All hisba or justice-related cases were administered by a qualified person called the “muhtasib”. The institution of “mazalim” was established to secure justice at the highest level of authority and operated as a supreme court.
Muslim jurists used a variety of methods to reach their legal percepts beside basic reliance on the Quran and the Sunna, including analogy, preference and consideration of the common good. In principle, everything is viewed as legal or lawful in Shari’a unless proven otherwise. Any wise or just conduct is welcomed by the Shari’a, because wisdom and justice are the ultimate goals of faith and belief in the One God by all believers.
Many legal principles in the Quran and Sunna, which have continuously been stressed and elaborated by generations of jurists, through successive centuries ensure justice conceptually and practically. The dignity of the human being as such has been particularly stressed in the Quran [17:70], whatever the ethnicity, gender, origin, or age of the individual may be. The rights of those you like or dislike have to be secured in a very meaningful way. Shari’a is against any kind of compulsion – material or psychological through temptation or intimidation – which may be made to make the human being state anything against his/her conviction. This principle stands clear with regard to either faith [the Quran 2:256, 10:99, 11:28], testimony or point of view [2:282]. The rights of the defendant for a fair inquiry or trial, and the rights of the prisoner have also been stressed in the strongest possible terms [e.g. see Abu Yusuf, al-Kharaj, al-Salafiyya, Cairo: 1347H., pp. 161-6, 190-1]. The rights of the combatant as a prisoner of war or requester of asylum are recognized and protected [e.g. the Quran 9:6, 76:8-8-9]. Muslim juristic contribution to international law in peace and war preceded the known work of the Dutch jurist Hugo Gratius [1583-1645] by several centuries. The work of the distinguished jurist Mohammad ibn al-Hasan al-Shaybani (d.189H./804), with its Arabic title “al-Siyar” or “the running of military operations”, stands as a clear example. Interestingly enough, jurists of international law from a variety of countries have formed an association in Gottingen, Germany, which they called “al-Shaybani Association for International Law”. The association was initially presided over by the late Egyptian jurists Dr. Abd al-Hamid Badawi, whose deputy was the Syrian scholar Dr. Salah al-Din al-Munajjid [see the ‘Introduction’ of Dr. Salah al-Din al-Munajjid to “Sharh Kitab al-Siyar al-Kabir” of Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Shaybani, by Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Sarakhsi, Institute of Manuscripts: League of Arab States, Cairo: 1971, Vol. 1, p. 14; also: Moh. Haidallah, The Muslim Conduct of State].
The Islamic law called for a special consideration of the evidence required in commercial transactions, whose circumstances are by their nature different from the general civil transactions [the Quran 2:282]. As the late prominent Egyptian jurist Dr. Abd al-Razzaq al-Sanhuri and other modern Muslim jurists have pointed out, the Islamic jurisprudence has its pioneering achievements in such legal principles as the abuse or misuse of the right, the consideration of adventitious circumstances in any civil matters, the liability for negligence… etc. [see Sanhuri’s Introduction to the Egyptian Civil Code of 1949, and to his work on civil law “al-Wasit”, Vol. 1]. The International Conference on Comparative Law in The Hague in 1932 recognized the distinctive achievements of Shari’a, and its potential in the modern world, and later an international juristic conference in Paris in 1951made a parallel resolution.
Furthermore, Muslim civilization was appreciated by all those who enjoyed the fruits of its knowledge and sciences, Muslims and non-Muslims. It was appreciated for its schools, centers of high education and research, public libraries, hospitals, observatories… etc. Non-Muslims frequently came from Europe to Muslim cities seeking knowledge or medical treatment. They did not come naturally to learn the Islamic faith or the revealed teachings or law, but to learn the kind of universal knowledge which Muslims were recognized with an authority as in the fields of philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, medicine, applied arts, and refined crafts, etc. Muslim women were recognized as outstanding specialists in medicine and surgery in Muslim Spain and other areas of the Muslim lands. Mosques had been admired by non-Muslims and continue to be admired to this very day, for their splendid architecture and fascinating decorations. Fine textiles and perfumes have had for a long time the traces of Muslim civilization in their world trade names such as Damascene, Mosulene, Marocaine, musk, and etc. A well-spread network of land and water routes efficiently connected Muslim lands from within, and connected them with the outside world and secured the trade routes between East and West. These well-maintained ways of transportation and communication, in addition to a similar well-organized mail service for the benefit of the authorities and the public, facilitated the spread of civilization that developed in Muslim lands from its main centers through different directions.
Civilization for the whole Humanity:
Muslim civilization was given the name “Muslim” only in later times by historians. In its time, it was appreciated by the contemporary world that knew it only as universal civilization, benefiting all mankind, though it flourished first among Muslim peoples. Civilization, whatever its origins, stages and classifications, is a whole phenomenon, a continuation of human development whatever its different places and times may be. As it has been previously emphasized, Muslim civilization in the past was developed and enjoyed by Muslims and non-Muslims, Arabs and non-Arabs, and by people of Muslim lands and people of non-Muslim lands. Muslims had benefited from the contributions of previous as well as contemporary civilizations such as the Graeco-Roman-Byzantines, Persian and Indian civilizations. However, Muslims developed those heritages and left their fingerprints in their outcomes. Muslims followed an empirical attitude in science, leaving a Greek theoretical speculative one, and showed interest in all aspects of applied sciences (e.g. observatories, surgical instruments, pharmaceutics, hospital and library services, cartography, etc), while an attitude towards abstraction was obvious in their aesthetics. More important, they developed a system of care for neighbors and neighborhood and local community welfare. These and other traits characterized the universal civilization that developed in Muslim lands in past centuries.
The civilizational effects of Islam and Muslims are true evidence of the significance and value of the message of Islam. Not all the people are interested in going through the faith of Islam and reading its teachings in order to understand the religion, although this may be essential on the part of anyone who feels that his/her intellectual and moral responsibility of knowledge and judgment require doing so. But all people can easily appreciate the common good and human perspective of Islam and come to think about the factors behind them. In other words, the civilizational achievements of Islam and Muslims have been a permanent evidence of the value of the message of Islam. Muslim civilization in medieval times was not only known for its libraries, laboratories, observatories and hospitals, but also for its gardens and fountains, refined textiles and beautifully designed clothes and rugs, perfumes, fragrant incense, decorated glass and pottery and metal products manufactured by Muslims and non-Muslims in Muslim lands. Hard work and perfection are taught by Islam to make the individual achieve the acceptance and reward of God in this life and in the eternal life to come. It is also required for good business to earn one’s living in this present life, and it may be supported morally and spiritually by believers other than Muslims as well. Besides, Muslims, as all human beings, in addition to being inspired by the guidance of their book, have also appreciated the beauty that is evidence in God’s creation of nature, and have tired to reflect on it in their arts and crafts. Islamic teachings about cleanliness were significantly reflected in the establishment of public baths, of which there were once some 27000 in the city of Baghdad alone at the time of the Abbasid Caliph al-Muqtadir (908-932), according to al-Khatib al-Baghdadi in his voluminous history of Bagdad. There were also 60000 in other times. Various kinds of cosmetics and dress fashions were known to have been enjoyed by Muslim women and the rights of Muslim women as members of the family and society were legally and morally secured by Islam. Ulayyah, the daughter of the Abbasid Caliph al-Mahdi (775-785) and the sister of the well-known caliph al-Rashid (786-809), in order to cover a blemish on her forehead “devised a fillet set with jewels which was soon adopted by the world of fashion as the ornament of the day ‘ala’Ulayyah’” as it was reported by al-Asfihani in “al-Aghani” and quoted by Hitti in his “History of the Arabs” [McMillan, London: 1970, p302].
Islam as a Civilization Message:
Islam aims at developing the human potential, as well as the natural resources necessary to realize this potential, through the motivation of faith in God and accountability of the human being: “It is He who has produced you from the earth and entrusted you with development on it” (11:61). God Himself is in no need of being recognized or worshipped, but His messages to human beings have aimed to secure their own moral and material success in the development entrusted to them (51:56-58). Islam establishes faith in God on the basis of knowledge of His creation, and considers the human work in this world and the human behavior with people in it as ways of worshipping God. The Quran emphasizes the “dignity of the children of Adam” (17:70) – all of them not only Muslims. It indicates that dignity cannot be split from securing the required good things of life. The Quran also defends the free movement of people throughout land and sea, and even through the atmosphere and space when this becomes possible (45:12-13). The human merits in all their dimensions physical, intellectual, moral, psychological, and spiritual, with which the human being is favored over many of God’s creation, have to be maintained and developed (17:70) by the individual, society, and the state in order to prove gratefulness to the grantor through developing the world with which he/she is entrusted (11:61). This can be done through the development of human relations on the basis of justice and fair treatment wherever humans live, (5:2, 30:22, 49:13, 60:8), starting from one’s own family and extending this behavior to neighborhood, society, country, and the whole world. During the prominence of Muslim civilization, the Muslim state provided public services and all requirements of economic development, including roads and water resources for the whole population. Educational and medical institutions were established by the state, as well as by private efforts. Social security for the elderly, the disabled, the seriously ill, the unemployed, and those in hardship was available to all those who needed it, Muslims and non-Muslims. Hosting and helping travelers and strangers suffering from unexpected hardships became a tradition during Muslim civilization, since it is a fundamental teaching in the Quran.
Enjoying human rights is inseparable from fulfilling the human duty and obligation in maintaining “the human dignity”. Such values have to be protected and administered by the concerned authorities in the country and in the whole world (3:159, 4:58-59, 42:38, 49:9). This is a stage that can be reached by all mankind through use of intellectual and moral-spiritual abilities granted by the Creator. It is to be supported and guarded by the divine guidance for those who believe in God. Muslims worship God and attempt to present His message to others through persuasion and dialogue. They do so by co-operating with all human beings in developing the human and natural resources granted to them all by God. If these values are practiced necessarily by the human instinct or the intellect of the “homo sapiens”, it can be developed to the best of the human potential by the faith in God and human accountability before Him, which guards and prevents any waste committed by arrogance in the case of success, or humiliating despair in the case of failure. The believers in God have to represent His justice and grace in dealing with their fellow human beings whoever they may be, believers or non-believers, co-citizens or others, men or women, adults or children, friends or enemies “And We have not sent you but as a grace and mercy for all being” : (21:107 see also 4:136, 5:2, 4). Justice within the country and through the whole world cannot be confined to political and legal aspects, it has to be comprehensive and include socio-economic aspects of human relations. It has to be secure the “good things of life” for all developed and developing nations, producers and consumers, lenders and borrowers, and the powerful and weak.
Diversity within unity:
It is essential for the continuation and spreading of a universal or “multiethnic” civilization at any time to accommodate human differences through extending times and different places. In the past, such a requirement was obvious in the state of affairs of what has become known as Muslim civilization. While Islam establishes grounds of “common religious culture” it does not require an abandoning of any feeling or practice that represents a natural relation to a particular human group and its socio-cultural life, as long as such a feeling or a practice does not contradict the teachings of Islam. Feelings of closeness to a certain people or a certain place are normal, if they are not being turned into racism or ethnic chauvinism “asabiyyah”. The people to whom one is related represent merely an extensive family, and the land where one is born represents an extensive neighborhood as Gustave von Grunebaum put it in his “Unity and Variety in the Muslim Civilization”.
“From this point of view, the self identification as a Muslim of a ‘nationalistic’ Persian of the Samanid period would appear perfectly legitimate, in as much as he would continue to accept the Islamic axioms of monistic theism and prophetism, as well as the value judgment which dedicates the life of a man at the service of God. It is only within this intellectual emotional frame work that he strives after the political independence of his people and the revival of the cultural glories of the Iranian past. Under the surface of the Muslim identification, no end of changes that may occur, but they will hardly ever affect the identification as such” [p. 19]; “…the philosophical and scientific potential of Islam was actualized and restated in terms of acceptable to the representatives of the older traditions with which the new religious civilization has to deal. Persian administrative and political thinking, Hellenistic techniques or philosophizing and of secular science, Indian mathematics and medicine were mastered effortlessly. The linguistic Arabization of the borrowings contributed to their assimilation, the foreign view point- whenever pounded in an Islamized setting and in an Islamized terminology – would be experienced as genuinely Islamic. On the other hand, the progressive explicating of the data of the faith and of their cultural implications would enlarge the basis of inter-civilization receptivity. The flourishing of the Abbasid Empire between AD 760 and 804 thus came to represent [an] integration of Islamic civilization, in which room had been made for ‘local’ traditions which were in part admitted in a bookish fashion, but which mostly forced themselves into the new synthesis through the realities of an actual symbiosis” [p. 23].
In the field of arts, Richards Ettinghausen underlined in the same work the “Interaction and Integration” that occurred:
“The unique character of Muslim art is a commonly known fact, which is experienced even by people who know hardly anything about this civilization. The main normative force which created this phenomenon was Islam itself…; it created a way of life and attitudes which deeply influenced its architecture, the range and character or its iconography, the treatment and type of ornament, and the choice of material everywhere in its domain. Yet, in spite of the apparent uniform character of Islamic art, everybody who becomes familiar with its various aspects realized more and more the tremendous variety in the different regions and even in the changing periods within a single territory. These differences are so marked that if we take for instance pottery, one of the commonest decorated materials, we can date within a century, sometimes within a half or a quarter of a century, any archaeological site where shreds have been found, and again at times also information about influences of trade or of migratory workers” [p. 107]. (Unity and Variety in Muslim Civilization, edited by Gustave von Grunebaum, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago 1967).
Within one region such as Muslim Spain (Andalus), each city might have its reputation in a particular civilization feature. According to al-Maqqari, the prominent historian of Andalus (d. 133), “When a scholar dies in Seville and his estate wants his books sold, the books are carried to Cordova, where the market for books is there. But when a musician dies in Cordova, his instruments are carried to Seville for sale, where the market for them is there.” Art became a symbol of the universality of Islam, and the diversity of its civilization as well. In this field, the contribution of the non-Muslim artists and artisans came in harmony with the general Muslim atmosphere, while they practiced their own professional traditions. Besides, non-Muslims could become ministers or court physicians and could hold top positions in the central and local administrations. Muslim civilization was able to assimilate the various religions and ethnicities, as it was able to assimilate various civilizational heritages. It was able to acquire, absorb, supplement and add to the heritage of knowledge known in that time and transmit their contributions around, and thus made the “Renaissance” later possible in Western Europe through Latin translations of Arabic words. The Europeans came to recognize the value of that knowledge, and the achievements of Muslim civilization overflowed into Europe from Muslim Spain, Sicily and Italy. It was indeed transmitted to Europe by the Crusaders themselves at the time of their occupation of the lands east of the Mediterranean. The inter-religious intellectual debate among Muslim thinkers such as Ibn Rushd (Averoes d.1198) and al-Ghazali (d.1111) and Ibn Rushd’s debate with the Jewish philosopher Ibn Maymun [Maimonides, d.1204] and the Christian theologian Thomas Aquinas [d.1274] have been repeatedly emphasized. The continuous stream of human civilization had provided Muslims with other nations, contribution, and Muslim contributions were spread to Europe and other parts of the world where Muslims had relations.
Participation in the Contemporary Civilization Has to Precede Influence:
Muslims throughout their role in history had searched for the civilizational traditions available in their time. They absorbed these traditions primarily through translations provided often by non-Muslims. They began, however, by presented what they had learned with their own understanding, exploration and sometimes supplement. When Muslims became legitimate representatives of knowledge and were recognized as authorities in the fields, they were able to incorporate their new and original contribution to world civilization. Their achievement in acquisition and innovation came to be known after sometime as the civilization of Muslim peoples or Muslim lands. In other words, Muslim civilization started as universal civilization before it came to be distinguished with its Muslim connotation.
Such a Muslim contribution to world civilization was dynamic and variable, according the existing sources. Muslims had to first absorb and master knowledge before they could add and influence, depending on the given circumstances. Participation, continuation, and transfusion of new elements represent the only way for developing a sense of humanness and morality in contemporary civilization. Japan is a significant example of becoming a partner in the world civilization. Muslims too cannot isolate themselves from the present civilization, or wait for its self-destruction and then jump off to create a Muslim civilization on their own terms. Civilizations cannot be developed in a vacuum or all of a sudden. Civilizational developments occur gradually and take time to bear their fruits. One cannot do the teaching before learning first. No change could be down without knowing what already exists and without knowing what needs to continue or what needs to be changed and how could it be changed for what is better. The process of civilization cannot be taken as a political coup! In this era of globalism, all humanity is in one boat. The destruction of the contemporary civilization would be a disaster not only to evil-doers but also to passive wishful thinkers, regardless of their good intentions and utopian dreams. The Quran says: “and be ware of a tumult which does not affect in particular the wrong-doers from among you to the exclusion of others” [The Quran 8:25].
Muslims would not be able to incorporate into the contemporary civilization the moral values they believe in, if they keep themselves aloof intellectually and psychologically from such a civilization, or if they keep imitating and following it without being critical and creative. This civilization, giving its unimaginable advances in transportation and communication, has become indeed very global, whatever or wherever its geographical start happened to be. Again, Japan, which is now a true partner in this civilization, presents us with strong evidence. Besides, other countries such as India, China, South Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore are also working with the same energy and enthusiasm to catch up with the West. Globalism has become a characteristic of our era, and has inevitably led to the emergence of universal pluralism. Democracy in its elaborated concepts and developed institutions is an invaluable production of the West, for which no better alternative has appeared, in spite of the obvious shortcomings of a secularization of the entire human life in the name of democracy, which have been made known by Westerners themselves who have also been enjoying and praising the blessings of free thinking and free expression provided by democracy. Further, Muslims need to share the contemporary advances in public administration, management of enterprises public and private and management of mixed sectors, as well as non-governmental and non-profit organizations. In addition, all agree that they need to share the achievements of science and technology.
The divine guidance, as revealed in the Quran and Sunna allows for the human intellect which represents, with the divine guidance, the most invaluable blessings of the Lord to the human species. Both have to interact with one another in accordance with God’s will and plan, without contradicting one another, or being isolated from one another. The believer in God and His gifts to the human race as a whole has to search for “wisdom” wherever it may be, and “the believer in God is the most deserving of whatever wisdom he/she may find” – according to tradition of the Prophet (brought out by al-Tirmidhi). The Quran reads: “Give them glad tiding to my [true] worshippers who listen to all that is said, and follow of it what is best; it is those whom God has graced with His guidance, and it is those who have really minds” [39:17-18].
This divine guidance was observed by the Muslims in the past, and has to be observed in the contemporary world with regard to any civilizational development they may have come across. Such a human interaction is essential in a universal civilizational development. “And if God has not enabled people to react positive towards on another, corruption would surely overwhelm the earth; but God is limitless in this bounty unto all-beings” [2:251], “and as for the scum, it passes away as [does all] dross, but that which is of benefits to people abides on earth” [13:17]. It is a responsibility that the entire world will someday come to acknowledge for the Muslims and Islam, if it is fulfilled. It is also the only effective way to present Islam positively to humanity as a whole in our time. Such a message is destines to reach the human masses all over the world, whereas any preaching can reach only a very thin minority or a selected audience.
An Enormous Need For A Moral Direction:
The contemporary global civilization badly needs a moral dimension to correct its direction, fill in its gaps, treat its limitations, widen its perspective, deepen its foundations, and safeguard its progress against abuse and divergence and internal decay. Such a decay may develop from detected or undetected psychological and intellectual and sociological factors, whether they may be on the surface or in depth. In this way, the contemporary civilization could be more balanced, effective, comprehensive, safeguarded and self-correcting.
In spite of their tremendous material progress, the most developed societies in the contemporary civilization are suffering from physical and environmental pollution. Drugs, alcoholism, violence, family deterioration and gang mushrooming are daily practices by children and youth who have abandoned their families or have been abandoned by their families. Corruption at high levels among politicians and civil servants, judges and police is accelerating. Sharpening gaps between the haves and have-nots, as well as madness in space exploration and war destructiveness are shaking, while physical and social diseases get less attention and spending from the state authorities. These are only examples of the well-known sufferings of the contemporary civilization as represented at the top of today’s world.
Robert A. Denther points out in his book “Major Social Problems” about poverty: “Most poverty in America rests with those who are too old or too young (i.e. children under 18 years old) too sick or too disabled or too remote from economic opportunity by virtue or geography or ethnic discrimination to benefit from the growing economy. Poor people are not willing to be poor. Most of them work if they could [and as hard as they could” [Road McNally, U.S. 1972, pp.113-115]. The American Bar Association panel in Washington on August 3, 1993 underlined these alarming statistics about the year 1991:
• One in five American children lives below government acknowledged standards for base subsistence, 14% of the nation’s preschool children live in impoverished families, and the overall child poverty rate tops that in any comparable country.
• Gunshot wounds are leading cause of death for both African American and Caucasian American teenage boys.
• African American and Latino children are more likely than Caucasian children to be poor.
“Newsweek” magazine reported on September 11, 1989 that children in Philadelphia, PA start in drug trafficking when they are between six and eight years, then they become hooked on it!
As for violence, the final report on “The Causes and Prevention of Violence” in 1969 pointed out: “America has always been a relatively violent nation. Rapid social change in America has produced different forms of violence and widely varying patterns of motivations, aggression and victimization… Violence has usually been the “lava ‘flowing’ from the top of a volcano fed by deeper fires of social dislocation and injustice; it has not been stopped solely by capping the top”. An earlier report in 1968 from the “National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders” known as “the Kerner Commission Report” stated: “Disorder did not erupt as a result of a single ‘triggering’ or ‘precipitating’ incident, but was generated out of an increasingly disturbed social atmosphere… The typical rioter was a teenager, a young adult, a life-long resident of the city, a high school dropout, usually under-employed or employed in a menial job, with a new mood of self-esteem and extremely hostile to the high classes even of his own ethnicity… What the rioters appeared to be seeking was fuller participation in the social order and material benefits enjoyed by the majority, rather than rejecting the system in which they were anxious to obtain a place for themselves”. It is ironic that the same causes triggered the recent riots in Los Angeles and school mass killings after more than two decades, which sharply underline a serious failure.
With regard to the deterioration of moral responsibility in sexual behavior, the Census Bureau Report on “Fertility of American Women in June 1992, stated that about one in four births in 1991 were out of wedlock (24%), across all demographic strata not the poor only, and including the educated, the employed… etc. Pope John Paul has rightfully warned that the isolation of sex from its unitive and procreative purpose and roles could undermine the society’s stability. Social research has established relations between irresponsible sexual practices, drug-addiction, and violence, and between these ills and some mass media present actions especially the TV. Sexual irresponsibility has led to an acceleration in the cases of women abuse and children abuse (even in the churches) that we all now witness among developed countries, and also in the developing ones.
Such a lack of moral consciousness, which can be highly remedied through God consciousness, is crippling the contemporary civilization from reaching the full potential of social width and psychological depth. IN a symposium organized by UNESCO in New Delhi in December 1951 on “The Human Ideal and Philosophy of Education in the East and the West”, the distinguished scholars and thinkers from both parts of the world discussed the danger of “the enslaving of the human’s own self through his/her effort to control the nature by means of science”. A French writer, Andre Rousseau quoted Terez Bruce in significantly underlining a most serious and urgent epistemological and educational problem in our time: “…the problem of developing an anthropology which is not the science of the human animal, but the science of the whole human being, including all his/her spiritual values, studied from individual and social points of view in the same time”. Rada Kreshnan, the outstanding Indian thinker, described the religious experience as an “innate consciousness and absolute liberation… It’s not merely a case of conviction about a series of given concepts, but a shake of the whole being while facing the problems that come out from the human relations in the daily realities: it is a way of life, love and practice of wisdom”. A professor of philosophy at Colombo University in Sri Lanka, G.B. Mala Lazyyikira, called the attention to “one of the most silly [and destructive] outcomes of the mechanical [dominant trend, which] is ‘the naïve average person,’ who lacks cultural refinement and ideals and is fully closed to any that he/she has not personal [material] interest in it, and whom the various mass media have contributed to make his/her general pattern”. Clarence Faucet, a dean at Stanford University in California U.S. and the head of the department of education there at that time, expressed his worry “that education may be concerned excessively with ‘methods’, while it has an unjustified suspicion about abstract values”. Maulana Abu al-Kalam Azad, the prominent Islamic scholar and national politician in India warned that “The Human being will never be able to find a convenient solution for his/her problems: individual and social, national and international, before he/she can recognize properly his/her own being, and can define his/her place in the greater universe”.
In contemporary international relations, Dr. Mahathir Mohammad, the Malaysian Prime Minister in his address to the General Assembly of the United Nations during its forty sixth session on September 24, 1991, has underscored some serious signs of the missing moral dimension in the modern world: “The world needs policing…, but are we to have self-appointed policemen, or are we to have a police force that is beholden to the U.N.?... Can our conscience be clear if a whole nation is starved into submission… and the principal victims are the old and the infirm, the pregnant mothers and the newborns?... Should wars be fought or [international] police action taken by totally destroying the recalcitrant nation in order to avoid causalities among the police force?... We condemn chemical warfare, but must we still have nuclear weapons around?... Who determines when a deterrent is needed?... [Can we be] sure that someone irrational might not become a leader and gain access to the button?... Weapons for defiance should be solely for defense. We need weapons only for fighting criminals… We want to remain independent, and to conform to international norms as determined by all nations of the world… The international community is now at the cross-roads. We truly have a chance to build a better world through consensus and to use the UN as the principal forum and vehicle for achieving our objectives. We cannot afford to miss this historic opportunity… It must, however be underlined that a global consensus approach requires tolerance for different ideas and practices inherent in our complex and pluralistic world. Let us then work together as partners in our common endeavor to build a better world”.
Towards a Muslim Constructive Role in the Contemporary Civilization:
A Muslim impact on the contemporary global civilization can only be reached through constructive engagement and effective participation in it. Wishful dreaming for its end so that another civilization will rise in its place is not a practical matter. A Muslim participation in the contemporary global civilization has to be itself ‘contemporary’, not just a repetition or imitation of historical efforts of the past. Past efforts were made according to the existing circumstances, and were considered at that time a progress in relation to what has been previously dominant. Our past civilization made benefit of the contributions existing at the time, and did not totally reject or ignore them. In fact, it maintained them to their best and developed them through continuous additions and advances well-known in the universal history of civilization. In this way, Muslims could become constructive partners in world progress, and become productive successors of earlier civilization builders, who are worthy of having a civilization to be named “Muslim” by later generations. In the past, Muslims became recognized resources for Greek, Persian and Indian knowledge, presenting it and adding to it through their intellectual and moral merits. What historians called a “Muslim civilization was in fact a part of world civilization, by Muslim and non-Muslim efforts in the Muslim countries.
Muslims have to work earnestly and modestly to prove their role in the contemporary civilization. This will enable them to pump and infuse some moral values into its stream. They can do so, only, through their individual and social behavior, not through any superficial or empty rhetoric, and definitely not by making theoretical statements. Muslims can be a force of moral inspiration to the contemporary global civilization, which may influence all the participants in it. In this way, Muslims could become known as the spiritual and intellectual contributors to the ‘revitalization and moralization’ of the contemporary global civilization. They can do that only through true Islamic values, conscientious thinking, and productive actions.
In this world of global pluralism, diversity is inevitable within any group, religious or ethnic, which may spread over various parts of the world. Muslims themselves have had such an experience with diversity throughout history.
Let humanity see Islam through the sincere and persistent efforts of Muslims. Only through discovering the wonders of God’s creation, developing and beautifying our world (morally and physically), nurturing sincere understanding and honest cooperation among peoples and nations, showing a true compassion to all peoples, and giving contemporary global civilization its badly-needed infusion of richness, warmth, width and depth; only through such merits and efforts Muslims can have an everlasting impact on contemporary civilization.
The Quran’s guidance is very inspirational:
“…and help one another in furthering virtue and righteousness, and do not help one another in furthering evil and aggression” [5:2]
“And say [unto them]: Act and God will behold your deeds, and [so will] the conveyor of His message and the believers…” [9:105]
“Verily, God is with those who are conscious of Him, and are withal doing their best to offer what is good.” [16:128]

The American public education stands neutral and passive towards these moral defects. Dr. William K. Kilpatrick, the professor of education at Boston College and the author of “Why Johnny Can’t Right from Wrong” has pointed out the moral failure of public education in his article. “Turning out moral illiterates” [Los Angles Times 20.7.1993]: “Many of today’s young people have difficult time seeing any moral dimension to their actions. There are many reasons why that is true, but not more prominent than a filed system of education… It tells children to decide for themselves what is right or wrong. IN (the past) teachers worried about students chewing gum; today they worry about robbery and rape [and even murder]. Decision making curricula pose thorny ethical dilemmas to students, leaving them with the impression that morality is problematic and that all questions of right and wrong are in dispute… The assumption behind the ‘student moral decision making’ method is that students will arrive at good moral conclusions if only they are given the change. The actual result is moral confusion. A recent national study of 1700 students between 6th and 9th graders revealed that a majority of boys considered rape to be acceptable under certain conditions. Astonishingly, many of the girls agreed. This kind of moral illiteracy is further encouraged by values-education programs that are a little more than courses in self-esteem… They are based on the questionable assumption that a child who feels good about himself/herself will not want to do anything wrong. It is just as reasonable to make an opposite assumption that a child who has uncritical self-regard will conclude that he/she cannot do anything bad. Such naïve self-acceptance result in large part from ‘non-directive, non-judgmental as long as you feel comfortable with your choices’ a mentality that had pervaded public education for the last two and half decades. Many of today’s drug education, sex-education and values-education courses are based on the same 1960 philosophy that helped fuel the explosion in teen drug use and sexual activity in the first place.”

Democracy and the Concept of Shura - Dr. Fathi Osman


Islam in a Modern State:
Democracy and the Concept of Shura
Dr. Fathi Osman
Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding
History and International Affairs
Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
Georgetown University
Washington, D.C. 20057
The Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding
The Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding: History and International Affairs was established in 1993 by Georgetown University and the Foundation pour l'entente entre Chrétiens et Musulmans, Geneva, to promote dialogue between the two great religions. The Center focuses on the historical, theological, political and cultural encounter of Islam and Christianity, the Muslim world and the West. Located in the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and Georgetown University, the Center combines teaching, research and public affairs.
Center faculty and visiting faculty offer courses on Islam and the history of Muslim-Christian relations for undergraduate and graduate students at the University. In addition, a broad array of public affairs activities and publications seek to interpret the interaction of the Muslim world and the West for diverse communities: government, academia, the media, religious communities, and the corporate world.
Dr. Fathi Osman
Fathi Osman was a Visiting Research Professor at the Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding in the spring of 1997. Dr. Osman has taught at the University of Southern California, Temple University, Princeton University, Imam Muhammad ibn Saud University, Al-Azhar in Egypt and Oran University in Algeria.
Dr. Osman earned his undergraduate degree in Islamic Byzantine Relations at the University of Cairo, Egypt, and his doctoral degree in Islamic Economic and Financial Institutions at Princeton University in New Jersey. his publications included: Islamic Thought and Human Change, An Introduction to Islamic History, Human Rights Between Western Thought and Islamic Law, On the Political Experience of the Contemporary Islamic Movements, The Muslim World, Issues and Challenges, Jihad: A Legitimate Struggle for Human Rights; Muslim Women in the Family and Society, Shari'a in a Contemporary Society: Islamic Law and Change, and Concepts of the Quran: A Topical Reading of the Divine Revelation.
Islam in a Modern State:
Democracy and the Concept of Shura
Democracy among Modern Ideologies
The term "ideology" has become dominant during the last two centuries, starting in France with the philosopher A.L.C. Destutt de Tracy who used the term to refer to the "science of ideas". As Encyclopedia Britannica explains,
In the loose sense of the word, ideology may mean any kind of action-oriented theory or any attempt to approach politics in the light of a system of ideas. Ideology in the stricter sense stays fairly close to Destutt de Tracy's original conception, and may be identified by five characteristics: (1) it contains an explanatory theory of a more or less comprehensive kind about human experience and the external world; (2) it sets out a program, in generalized and abstract terms, of social and political organization; (3) it conceives the realization of this program as entailing a struggle; (4) it seeks not merely to persuade, but to recruit loyal adherents demanding what is sometimes called commitment; (5) it addresses a wide public, but may tend to confer some special role of leadership on intellectuals. 1
The "-isms" that have dominated the nineteenth and twentieth centuries may suggest that "ideologies are no older than the word itself - that they belong essentially to a period in which secular faith has increasingly replaced traditional religious faith" (emphasis added). 2
Britannica points out certain similarities between any "ideology" and a "religion", since both are concerned with questions of truth and questions of conduct,
but the differences are perhaps more important... A religious theory of reality is constructed in terms of a divine order and is seldom, like that of the ideologist, centered on this world alone. A religion may present a vision of a just society, but it cannot easily have a practical political program. The emphasis of religion is on faith and worship; its appeal is to inwardness and its aim is purification of the human spirit. An ideology speaks to the group, the nation or the class. Some religions acknowledge their debt to revelation, whereas ideology always believes, however mistakenly, that is lives by reason. Both demand commitment. 3
However, with regard to Islam, one may be some reservations about the distinctions between ideologies and religions presented in Britannica's article, since Muslims believe that Islam presents a whole way of life in this world and following it is a condition for the rewards of the eternal life to come. Purification of the spirit cannot be isolated from conducting human relations with others in this world, and both interact in the Islamic perspective of faith and righteousness.
As for "democracy" in particular, it is the ideology that has survived despite a general cooling in the fervor for ideologies as comprehensive intellectual tools for change. Democracy has maintained its common appeal to the modern human mind, at least with regards to its basic principles, in spite of the considerable criticism that it has been facing conceptually and practically, from its own supporters as well as its opponents. Derived from the Greek words "demos" (the people) and "kratia" (rule), used to describe early democratic forms of government developed in the sixth-century B.C.E. Greek city-states, the term has been defined in a condensed way to mean "the government of the people, by the people, for the people". It originally designates "a government where the people share in directing the activities of the state, as distinct from governments controlled by a single class, select group or autocrat", according to the New Columbia Encyclopedia, but
has been expanded to describe a philosophy that insists on the right and the capacity of a people, acting either directly or through representatives, to control their situations for their own purposes. Such a philosophy places a high value of the equality of individuals and would free people as far as possible from restraints not self-imposed. It insists that necessary restraints be imposed by the consent of the majority and that they conform to the principle of equality. 4
Natural Law, Social Contract
Freedom and equality of all citizens or even all human beings represent the cornerstones of democracy. A doctrine of "natural law" that supersedes and prevails over any state law developed the idea of natural rights, such as the rights of self-preservation, which in turn was used to support the rights of citizens and human beings. Another support for natural human rights was provided by the idea of "the social contract" that binds both the ruler and the people by reciprocal obligations, in the view of the British philosopher John Locke (1632-1704) and the Swiss-born philosopher Jean Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778).
Representation, Elections, and Party Systems
Because direct democracy is difficult or even impossible to practice in any relatively wide and populous country, representation has become an essential principal and practice in democracy. Elections and political parties have provided the mechanism for the representation of the people in directing the main activities of the state, especially the executive and the legislative branches. Universal suffrage and the multi-party system are significant features in the democratic process, whatever disadvantages each may have.
Dilemmas have always emerged for representative body in considering the parallel and sometimes the sharply contradictory interest demands of the: individual versus society as a whole; elite versus the masses; majority versus the minority and vice versa; political democracy, economic development and private enterprise on one hand and social justice, human development and environmental preservation on the other. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, a continuous challenge meets any ideology that is by nature fixed in its fundamentals in the face of unceasing change in any human society, which requires dynamic creativity and continuous reconsideration of priorities and re-designation of strategies. Meanwhile, the state of constant elections often leads to a preference for short-term compromises and appeasing the masses, and allows pressure groups and lobbies to act vigorously - not always for the public interest or the mainstream benefit.
Moreover, while the mass media provide democracy with amazingly efficient and effective means of communication between the political leadership and the masses, these marvelous channels can be easily tempted professionally or financially to be means of public misguidance.
Democracy Stimulates Differences but Organizes Opposition
Democracy represents an ideal of justice, as well as a form of government. It develops a belief that freedom and equality are inherently good and that democratic participation in ruling secures, deepens and enhances human dignity. Democracy starts in the family and at school, and both should function in a way that nurtures democracy in a child's behavior. Democracy is presented in another sense as a comprehensive way of life, not merely a political system.
However, freedom of expression and assembly are essential for the life and flourishing of democracy. No democracy can exist without securing full rights for the opposition. James Madison (1751-1836), the fourth president of the U.S. (1809-1917), once wrote, "Liberty is to faction as air to fire." Freedom that promotes faction is valuable since false consensus or disappearance of differences may mean tyranny or stagnation. A democracy cannot deserve such a name if no differences or opposition exists. Yet, differences and opposition must be handled legitimately, without moral or physical assaults against opponents. Since democracy means freedom and equality, individual and group differences will always emerge, and this is healthy, as long as it is practiced properly.
Political Democracy and Social Justice
Modern democracies believe now, differently from what was established theoretically and practically before, that an interference of the state in the economy (to some degree without sacrificing the essence of democracy) may sometimes be necessary in order to deal with difficult problems like a severe recession, or to secure social justice, "The New Deal" promoted by President F.D. Roosevelt (1933-1945) to handle the U.S. recession in the 1930s is landmark in this respect. Western democracies have advocated and practiced to different degrees the concept of a "welfare state", especially when political parties with various socialistic tendencies rule.
Contradictions of the Democratic West
Democracy has to be universal for all of humanity: the rich and the poor, the developed and the developing. Exporting tobacco to other countries without a health warning; shipping food, medicine, chemicals and other products without expiration dates; ignoring the safety precautions or the inevitable harm of certain industries as long as they are established in other countries; and moving the nuclear waste to the open seas - a common property of all humanity - all such actions are not only undemocratic but are anti-democratic. As emphasized by Thomas L. Pangla, a professor of political science at the University of Toronto, in his book The Ennobling of Democracy: The Challenge of the Postmodern Age5, liberal democracy is forced to re-examine its internal structure and fundamental aims, especially after being deprived of its traditional enemy at the end of the Cold War. In the author's view, a significant negative in the postmodern age has been the "moral relativism" of many mainstream Western intellectuals. Pangla writes,
Philosophers of modernity, from Spinoza to Locke to Kant and even Hegel, spoke not simply of human rights but emphatically of 'natural rights', issued in moral 'laws of nature's God', and accompanied by such foundational concepts as the 'state of nature', 'the social contract', and 'the categorical imperative'. Nothing characterizes the spiritual climate of the West today so much as the persuasive disbelief in these once all-powerful philosophical pillars of modernity. Our philosophical currents are negative, skeptical, disillusioned. The postmodern is not 'what exists after modernity'; it is rather the state of being entangled in modernity, as something from which we cannot escape but in which we can no longer put on final faith… The cultural, moral, religious and even the civic permission of the Enlightenment were fulfilled in a much more ambiguous and controversial fashion than the mathematical, economic, and technological promises. The great attempts by the political philosophers of the Enlightenment to provide systematic, rational and generally acceptable foundations for public and private existence have proved to be inadequate. This is by no means to say that they have been altogether a failure.
Although all of humanity lives in an era of globalism through the fascinating technology of transportation, communication, and information, and thus are all human beings are living in one village or "riding the same boat", egotistic attitudes and visions dominate international relations - especially the material and cultural relations - between developed and developing countries. Instead of military power, the developed West uses its economic and technological superiority to obtain "secure" markets for its products, and "security" is defined by the West on its own political and ideological terms.
One may be reminded of an earlier challenge to the West before the postmodern age: that of previously colonized countries that became independent and looked to their former colonizers for advice and help in developing and modernizing the political, economic and social systems within their countries.
Democracy in Developing Societies
"In the industrialized countries of the West," A.H. Somjee points out in his book The Democratic Process in a Developing Society, 8
economic development, urbanization and some measure of social equality preceded the formation of democratic institutions. In some of the developing countries, on the other hand, this process has been reversed. There, the strategy of economic development at the expense of political liberation has not found many supporters. For such countries, a slow pace of economic advancement through the democratic process in not the only problem.
However, "although so far very few of these (developing) societies have been able to sustain and strengthen their liberal institutions", the author continues, "their gradual democratization is as likely to take place as their liberal institutions". In his preface, Somjee refers to Robert Dahl's suggestion that the democratic process is essentially concerned with two sets of related activities: exercising influence on leaders, and making governments responsive and accountable. Yet, Somjee underlines something distinctive in a developing society:
Within the situation of a developing country like India, however, the term "democratic process" has to mean more than that. To be able to attain the position referred to by Dahl, first of all the individual must be released from the constraints of the primary groups to which he (/she) is born, so that he (/she) may exercise his (/her) political choice in an uninhibited fashion. Simultaneously, the democratic process has to help him (/her) to grow in understanding and capacity, so that by trial and error and working in concert with his (/her) fellow men (women), he (/she) can learn and use his (/her) new political status to demand effective solutions to the problems which afflict them (emphasis added).
As examples for the challenges that the democratic process faces in India, the author notes: "With the exception of its top leadership, the main interest of the Congress Party as an organization was to line up the votes of the Christian and Muslims rather than involve them in the wider democratic process of India".9 He adds:
The survival of the democratic process in any society depends on its ability to address itself effectively to its basic problems. But this it can do only with the help of party organizations. No matter how conscious or involved the electorate may be, it cannot take the place of party organizations. It can merely observe, evaluate and replace one party by another. While the democratic process may be said to have struck root in India, the state of party organizations, on which its survival depends, is far from satisfactory. 10
However, there is no available framework that secures equal rights and responsibilities for all individuals and groups in contemporary pluralism better than democracy, and there is no other framework that makes possible self-criticism and self-correction within the system itself and while it is functioning.
Islam: A Faith and Worship,
As Well As a Comprehensive Way of Life
However, the religious dimension in the Islamic ideology or plan, of individual and social, local and global reform, does not mean the establishment of a theocracy. There is no clergy in Islam; any intelligent human being who knows the language and the style can understand and interpret God’s message and no supernatural or metaphysical power can be required or claimed for such a work.
God’s message has ‘been preserved and made known publicly through centuries; and no human being can add to it or detract from it. The ideology of Islam, if we may say so, is not totalitarian. It does not dictate details that dominate every moment or make an imperative for any human thought and move, nor does it claim to provide a definitive prescription in advance for every specific problem that may emerge at any time in the future. Islam presents the essential guidance that allows the creativity of the human mind to conceive, infer from, and build upon it. The ruling authorities cannot monopolize providing the interpretation of the divine guidance or offer new solutions for emerging problems from above without involving the people, and every sane adult has the right to participate in such a process.

Human Dignity

Human freedom and equality are fundamental in any democracy. Similarly, Islam considers “human dignity” fundamental to its guidance for the right way of life. The Quran reads: “We have indeed conferred dignity on the children of Adam, and carried them on land and sea, and provided for them sustenance out of the good things of life, and favored them far above most of Our creation” (emphasis added). 18 All the children of Adam, whatever their race, ethnicity, gender, age, social status and beliefs may be, have been granted dignity by their Creator without any distinction, and this human dignity must be secured and maintained by His guidance and laws through the Muslim teachers and authorities, and should never be subjected to violation or declination. Human dignity is comprehensive; it encompasses all human dimensions: spiritual, moral, intellectual and physical. Sustenance from the good things of life must be secured for every human being through fair conditions of work and decent social welfare for those who cannot work temporarily or permanently. Freedom to move from one place to another is an essential feature of human dignity that fulfills the universality of the human creature with his or her unique spiritual, moral, and intellectual potential. Any restrictions in this respect within the country or throughout the world must be considered against human dignity.
Human dignity comprises the fulfillment of obligations as well as the security of rights. Thus, the Quran uses the word “dignity” to underscore the correspondent human rights and obligations, which should be together carried out to secure the human dignity. Thus, a selfish view of freedom or human rights (which was noticed, for example, in French society after the 1789 revolution and in some Eastern European societies after the collapse of communism) can be avoided.
Early jurists gathered out from the various rules of Islamic Law (shari’a) held that its goal is securing and developing the human being in these five basic areas: life, family and children, mind, freedom of faith, and rights of ownership whether private or public. Human dignity is supported in Islam by educational and organizational measures, and is not presented as empty words, mere rhetoric or personal piety.

Shura in the Islamic Way of Life

Islam teaches that God alone is the One who is All-knowing, All-powerful and must be obeyed unconditionally according to a genuine conviction and belief. 19 Human beings have relative knowledge and no absolute power. They are all equal and enjoy dignity granted to them by God since their creation, and each is accountable in this life and in the life to come for his or her deeds. Every matter, even the faith itself, should rely on one’s conviction about what is right and what is wrong without any coercion or intimidation. As the Quran says, “No coercion is [allowed] in matters of faith.” 20 Based on these beliefs, any human being cannot decide arbitrarily and independently a matter that concerns others and not himself or herself alone, nor claim if he or she does so, an immunity from accountability. The Quran makes “shura” or “participation with others in making a decision that concerns them,” subsequent to and a consequence of the faith in God. It represents the positive response to His message and comes next to making prayers to Him, “and those, who respond to [the call of] their Lord, and keep up the prayers, and whose rule in a matter [of common concern] comes out of consultation among themselves...” (emphasis added). 21 The initiative of involving others in making a decision of common interest has to come from those who are responsible for leadership and making such decisions. However, those concerned people take the initiative to offer their nasiha (advice) to the leadership in a suitable way when they find this necessary, since giving advice is an obligation of every individual towards leaders and the public as well “a’imat al-Muslimin wa ‘ammatihim,” according to a tradition of the Prophet reported by Muslims. Enjoining the doing of what is right and good and forbidding the doing of what is wrong and evil is the responsibility of the state authorities as well as the people and any group of them. 22
Shura is not limited to the political field; it has to be developed starting with the family base to be a general way of life in all areas. Spouses, even in the case of divorce, have to conduct family matters “by mutual consent and counsel” (emphasis added). 23 Both requirements have to be fulfilled together without split, since consent must be based on mutual consultation and not taken for granted, and consultation should lead to mutual consent and not be exercised as a superficial formality. The child has to be educated to express himself or herself freely but properly about what ought to be done or avoided. 24 The family and the school have essential roles in developing shura as a way of life.
Shura means a serious and effective participation in making a decision, not merely a ceremonial procedure. The Quran addresses the Prophet who received divine revelation to rely on shura in making decisions concerning common matters for which no specific revelation had come: “and take counsel with them in all matters of common concern; then, when you have made a decision (accordingly), place your trust in God.” 25 If the prophet is addressed to involve the believers in decision-making regarding a common matter for which no specific revelation exists, all the believers a fortiori must follow this teaching. The distinguished Andalusian Quranic commentator Ibn ‘Atiyya (d. 546H/1151 C.E.) stated his commentary on this verse: “Shura is one of the basics of Islamic law (shari’a), and a mandatory rule; and any [who is entrusted with a public authority] who does not take the counsel of those who have knowledge and are conscious of God, should be dismissed from his [or her public] position, and there is no argument about that.” 26
The Prophet consulted his Companions when he confronted his enemies from Quraysh who challenged him and camped near Medina. In accordance with their opinions, he decided to meet his enemies in the battle of Badr in the year 1 H./622 C. E. Later, the Prophet also consulted his Companions about whether to go out of Medina to meet the attacking army or to stay in and defend the city when they attacked; he followed the majority opinion and met them in the battle of Uhud in 3H./624 C.E. In the attack of a tribal coalition against Medina in the year 5H./626 C.E., when the Prophet’s suggestion to give an attacking tribe some of its fruits to persuade their withdrawal was not approved by some of his Companions, he went along with them. Even in his private life, when his wife ‘A’isha faced a false accusation shortly afterwards, he asked his Companions for their opinions. Later on, in the year 23 H./644 C.E., as soon as Caliph ‘Umar was stabbed, he appointed a committee to discuss, among themselves and with the people, who would succeed him; and their decision had to be made by the majority.
It is obvious from the previously-mentioned verse [Quran 3:159], that any decision made should be based on the results of shura. It is evident in the historical events that the decisions taken were based on the opinions of the majority. Although the minority or even a single person may be right and the majority may be wrong, reliance on majority opinion is the only reasonable and acceptable procedure among human beings, for the risk of error in such a case is far less than in an individual or minority opinion. Freedom of expression and freedom of assembly are essential to determine the right decision among different views, and opposition is naturally indispensable for the life and efficiency of shura.
Besides, the courts, especially a supreme or constitutional court, can always check the constitutionality and legality of any decision. In case of any violation of the general principles of the Islamic Law (shari’a), any decision made by any authority can be overturned by courts.

Shura in the Political Life

Everyone has the right and obligation to participate in deciding who will be their leaders and representatives by shura, and the elected public bodies must reach their decisions by shura. The Quran states that a majority of human beings may not always be on the right track (see, for example, 2:243, 6:116, 7:187, 11:17. 17:89, and 37:71), but it never teaches that a majority of reasonable and sincere people can be less reliable and more erring than an individual or a minority among them; this is sharply pointed out by Muhammad Abduh and Muhammad Rashid Rida in their prominent commentary on the Quran. 27 The majority can make mistakes, but making mistakes is human and humans are only required to make serious efforts to determine what is right and to avoid mistakes, making use of accumulated human knowledge and experience about the discussed matter. Such requirements can be met far better in a majority decision. As previously mentioned, many precedents can be found in the life of the Prophet and the early Caliphs about decisions made according to the majority even if they differed from the leader’s view. Islam teaches that an individual must adhere to the society or community (al-jama’d), and the majority can only be identified in such a case. A Prophet’s tradition urges one to follow the most overwhelming majority (al-sawad al-a’zam) in case of a serious split (reported by Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Majah).
The primary area for shura is in choosing the head of the state. In our times, the state leader may be directly chosen by the people or by their elected representatives, and may be the head of the executive branch, or just a symbol for the state while the actual authority is given to the prime minister. In the last case, the prime minister is the leader of the political party whose candidates have won the majority of the seats of the representative body, which may also be called the “parliament.” The Quran states: “O you have attained to faith! Obey God, and obey the Conveyor of the Message [of God] and those from among you who have been entrusted with authority by you; and if you are at variance over any matter, refer it to God and the Conveyor of the Message [of God] if you believe in God and the Last day; this is advantageous [for your human relations] and most appropriate for reaching what is right” (emphasis added). 28 The verse indicates that those who are in authority should be those “from among you who are entrusted with authority by you” (ulu al-amr minkum). This may remind us of the characterization of democracy as establishing “the government of the people by the people for the people.”
While a democratic decision has to comply with “imagined” natural human rights or a social contact as a safeguard against any possible majority injustice, Muslims and those who are entrusted with authority “from among them, by them” are bound by the goals and general principles of shari’a that secure human dignity, and guard and develop for all human beings: their life, families and children, minds, freedom of faith and ownership of private or public property.
According to the Islamic historical precedents, there is a real binding contract—not a fictitious one—between the ruler and the ruled. The mutual pledge, which was called “bay’a,” holds the ruler responsible for assuring the supremacy of God’s law (shari’a) and justice, securing human dignity, serving the public interest, and fulfilling the entire duties of the position, while it holds the people responsible for supporting the ruler, obeying his decisions that comply with God’s law, and fulfilling their obligations. 29
The preceding verse implies that those who are entrusted with authority by the people form “organizational bodies” are not considered mere individuals, since they are always referred to in the Quran in the plural [see 4:59, 83].
Moreover, differences may naturally emerge within these bodies that which are entrusted with authority, or between them and the people or groups of them. The parties at variance are referred to the guidance of God and the Conveyor of His message, which may be presented and decided in the most appropriate way, whenever this becomes necessary, by a supreme court.
The head of the state can he elected directly by the- people or by the parliamentary representatives of the people, or can be nominated by these representatives and introduced to the public vote. Any procedure can be followed according to its own merits and to the given circumstances, and Islam accepts that which is in the interest of the people. 30 Early Caliphs were chosen primarily from a narrow circle and vested by bay’a, then the chosen Caliphs would go to the public to get their acceptance through the public bay’a. As previously indicated, bay’a is a mutual pledge: from the ruler to follow the Islamic Law and satisfy the public, and from the people to support the ruler and advise him.

Other Areas for Shura

* Shura has a role in the election of the people’s representatives in the parliamentary body—or bodies—and its practice of legislation, guarding the public interest through checking the executive exercise of power, and pursuing the people’s concerns. When the principle of “one person, one vote” fails to secure a fair representation of any group: ethnic, religious or social (i.e., women), justice (the main goal of shari’a) has to be secured by appropriate means in the given circumstances, such as assigning for each of such groups a certain number of seats in proportion to their size, which would be exclusively contested in certain constituencies or in the country as a whole by those who are related to the group, as some democratic ideas or practices have indicated. In addition, a limited number of seats, which should represent a minority in the whole parliament, may be occupied by elected representatives of professional or social organizations. Continuous democratic experiences always contribute ways for reaching the best possible representation of the people and their diverse structure and interests.
*Discussions, hearings, and reaching decisions by the representative body and its committees, within themselves, with the executive bodies or with other organizations or individuals in relation to any public concern, represent a vital area for the practice of shura.
*A significant practice of shura may occur if public referendum is found appropriate in certain matters of special importance, which may be decided by the legislature or by a required number of voters through an indicated procedure.
*In the executive branch and its departments, shura naturally has its place in the discussions and decisions.
*Shura has also to be practiced in the elections of leaders and boards in workers’, professionals’ and students’ unions, and in the discussions and decisions of these elected bodies, and in any wider conference they may arrange.
*Technical and professional shura ought to be conducted in schools, hospitals, factories, companies or any other business.
*In the courts, shura is followed when there is more than one judge ruling over the case, or when the jury system is applied.

Voting

The democratic mechanism in elections and decision-making is voting, and its known and accepted form is “one person, one vote.” This procedure was suggested by Caliph ‘Umar for the committee
that he appointed to determine who would succeed him as Caliph after being stabbed. It was further evident from many historical precedents—of which some have been previously mentioned—that the Prophet and the early Caliphs followed the visible majority in making their decisions. The above-mentioned tradition of the Prophet teaches that one has to follow the overwhelming majority (al-sawad al-a’ zam) when there is a serious spilt.
To those who argue that “one person, one vote” makes the judgment of the most knowledgeable person equal to that of the most ignorant one, one may reply by saying that, in relation to the common interest of the people, any adult with common sense and civic abilities and experience can make a judgment. Campaigns that support different candidates’ views and the mass media provide valuable information for a serious voter. Any discrimination in the votes, on whatever grounds, may be arbitrary. Judgment about a public matter of an uneducated but experienced person may be more sound than that of an inexperienced university graduate.
Women are equal to men in public responsibilities as the Quran explicitly states: “And the believers, both men and women, are in charge of [and responsible for] one another: they all enjoin the doing of what is right and good and forbid the doing of what is wrong and evil... ”31 Women’s views regarding who should succeed Caliph ‘Umar were pursued, even those of women who were staying in their homes. 32
The notable commentator on the Quran Ibn Jarir al-Tabari [d. 310H./922 C.E] and the prominent jurist Ibn Hazm [d. 450CH./668 C.E.] stated that a woman can occupy the distinguished position of a judge, if she is qualified for it.” 33 The Quranic verse about making a male witness equal to two female witnesses in a credit contract indicates that this is meant when a woman might not be familiar with such transactions and their legal requirements, “so that if one of them should make a mistake the other could remind her” [2:82]. It is obvious from the Quranic text, the historical social context, and the jurisprudential principle that: “a legal rule follows its reason: if the reason continues to exist, the rule holds, and if the reason ceases to exist the rule is not applied”—all this makes it obvious that the verse does not address educated or business-experienced women, nor address common human interests which do not require specialization.
The distinguished jurist Ibn al-Qayyim [d. 751H./1350 C.E.] indicated in his book, al-Turuq al-Hukmiyya (Ways of Ruling), as well as other jurists, that this rule does not apply to the testimony of a woman in other areas that she may know well.34 If some jurists stated that a woman could be a judge, then the verse about her testimony cannot be understood as a general rule for the whole gender in all times and places.

Candidacy

Elections require several candidates from whom to chose for a position. Caliph “Umar nominated six distinguished persons from which one might be chosen as a candidate for the caliphate to succeed him. Some argue against such a procedure from an Islamic point of view, arguing that the Prophet said he “would not appoint in a public position one who had asked for it.” 35 According to scholars in this field and jurists, this is interpreted as a warning against asking for a public position merely for a personal benefit without considering its responsibilities and the required capabilities for fulfilling them. One who is capable for a public position, fully aware of its responsibilities, and thinks that he or she can fulfill them and commits himself or herself to do so, can ask for the position and mention his or her qualifications for it, as the Prophets Yusuf [Joseph] and Sulayman [Solomon] did. Yusuf said to the King of Egypt: “Set me in charge of the store-houses of the land, I am a knowing and honest guardian” [12:55], and Sulayman prayed: “O my Lord! Forgive me and grant me a kingdom such as may not befall anyone after me” [38:35]. It goes without saying that presenting the candidate’s merits and capability for the position, and criticizing others’ in capabilities should follow the legal and ethical principles of Islam. The requirements for a candidate, or what may bar a person from a candidacy can be decided in the light of Islamic legal and moral teachings, and according to social circumstances.
In Islam, women may be members of the parliament, ministers, judges, and-military and police officers, according to their merits and credentials, since they enjoy equal rights and responsibilities to men in joining the doing of what is right and good and forbidding what is wrong and evil. 36 Non-Muslims represent an inseparable part of the society and the state and have the right and duty to occupy positions in the executive, legislative and judicial branches and in the military and police as per their merits and credentials, according to the Prophet’s constitutional document in Medina and several historical precedents. A modern state is ruled by bodies, not by individuals, and non-Muslims would represent in any body their size and weight in the society. The prominent Shafi’i jurist al-Mawardi (d. 456H/1068 C.E.) stated that a Caliph can have a non-Muslim executive minister.37 Non-Muslims were known as ministers and top officials in Islamic states such as Egypt and Muslim Spain. As for a non-Muslim judge, he or she has to apply the state code of laws according to whatever his or her beliefs may be. However, the areas that are related or close to the faith—such as family matters and waqf (a property of which the revenues are permanently allotted to charity or certain beneficiaries) can be assigned to a judge of the litigant’s faith.

Multi-Party System, the Opposition

Political parties are essential for democracy, as they help people form their views and choices about persons or policies. Besides, the individual finds himself or herself helpless to oppose governmental authority, especially in a modem state with its enormous power provided by advanced technology in suppressing opposition and in influencing public opinion. The multi-party system has proved to be the most—if not the only—democratic formula in this respect. The one-party system has never allowed any real or effective opposition within itself, and such an opposition can never grow outside from it individuals who have no vehicle to contact the masses, and no power as individuals to challenge the government with all its authorities and oppressive measures.
Islam secures the right of assembly, and the Quran urges that groups may be formed to enjoin the doing of what is right and good and forbid what is wrong and evil, which is the essence of politics: “And let there be from among you a community (umma) that calls to good and enjoins the doing of what is right and forbids the doing of what is wrong” [3:104]. The word umma used in the verse may not always mean the whole community but just a group of people,38 especially when the word is connected with the preposition “from,” as in the above mentioned verses: “from among you...(minkum).” This need not hurt the fundamental unity of the people, since political differences are human and inevitable, and thus should not affect the public unity if they are properly handled in objective and ethical ways. As politics represent an area of human thinking and judgment and discretion (ijtihad), the Quran assumes that Muslims may face differences and even disputes,39 and they have to settle them according to the guidance of the Quran and the Sunna. Different legitimate approaches towards the understanding and interpretation of the divine texts and implementing them may naturally arise. Early Muslims had their conceptual differences from time to time, and they argued about the state leadership after the Prophet’s death. Their political differences were represented in certain groups, which freely and openly expressed their diverse views on that occasion in a public meeting at al-Saqifa. Later, Muslims had several theological groups with different political concepts, as they had their different jurisprudent! al schools, and such differences should not by any means hurt the public unity, when they are objectively and ethically tackled.
Accordingly, Muslims can form several Islamic political parties: all of them are committed to Islam, but each with its own concepts or methods of political activity, or with different programs of reform when they rule. Although establishing parties on ethnic grounds or for personal or family considerations ought not to be encouraged from the Islamic point of view—especially among Muslims—this may be acceptable in given circumstances.
Non-Muslims and secularists can have their political parties to present their views, and defend their interests and guard the human rights and dignity of all the children of Adam as the Quran teaches. Women can join or form the party they like. Political fronts and alliances may involve Islamic parties and others whenever this may be beneficial for the Muslims and the entire people. As well, coalitions can gather various parties, including Islamic ones, to form a government. Such a diversity in political thinking, concerns, and activities within the people’s unity represents a fundamental organizational tool for human pluralism, in order to secure and defend the dignity of all children of Adam.
Opposition is indispensable in a democratic system, and should not raise doubts to the Muslim mind. It is needed to scrutinize the government’s activities, and to be ready to replace it if it loses the confidence of the people. Opposition does not oppose for the sake of opposition; it should support the public unity during national crisis.
However, opposition may not be efficient or effective when the political parties become so many that forming a coalition to govern or a weighty opposition would be problematic. This is a challenge for the multi-party system, which some contemporary democracies are facing and suffering from. It may be overcome through political prudence and moral responsibility rather than by any legal restriction that may be arbitrarily decided or executed.

Legislation; Separation of Powers

Some Muslims may argue that, since God is the Lawgiver, there should not be a legislative body in an Islamic state. In fact, the legislature specifies and puts in detail the required laws, while the Quran and Sunna present general principles and certain rules. Even in the case of such particular rules in the Quran or the Sunna, different interpretations and jurisprudential views might arise about a certain text on the grounds of its language and its relation to other relevant texts. It is essential that a certain interpretation or jurisprudential view should be adopted by the state as a law, and this has to be decided by the legislature, so that the courts may not be left to different rules that may be applied in the same case according to the views and discretion of different judges—a complaint the well known writer Ibn al-Muqaffa’ [d. 142H./759 C.E.] made in his time.40
Besides, there is extensive room for what is allowed by shari’a “al-mubah,” and such an enormous area of allowed matters ought to be organized in a certain way, making any of them mandatory, forbidden, or optional according to the changing circumstances in different times and places. Public interest has its consideration in introducing new laws, which were not specified in the Quran and Sunna, but which are needed in a certain time or place, and which do, not contradict any other specific rule in the divine sources, but can be supported by the general goals and principles of shari’a. Many laws are required in a modem state in various areas such as traffic, irrigation, construction, roads, transportation, industry, business, currency, importing and exporting, public health,
education, and so on, and they must only be provided according to the consideration of public interest or in the light of the general goals and principles of shari’a, as there are no specific texts in the Quran and Sunna that directly deal with every emerging need in every time and place.
The Prophet himself expected that some cases, which may not have a particular corresponding rule in the Quran and Sunna, would face a judge who has to use his own discretion and judgment (ijtihad), which is naturally assisted by the essence of shari’a and guided by its general goals and principles. Such a juristic or judicial discretion, ijtihad, may have to be generalized and codified as a state law, and not left to personal differences of the jurists or judges. Changing circumstances influence the human under-standing of the legal text, and develop new legitimate needs for legislation. Considering the goals and general principles of the Islamic law in responding to changing social needs has been called in the Islamic law: “the conduct of the state policies according to shari’a (al-siyasa al-shari’iyya).” The distinguished jurist Ibn al-Qayyim wrote:
A debate took place between (the jurist) Ibn Aqil and another jurist. Ibn Aqil said, ‘Applying (discretionary) policies is prudence, and is needed and practiced by any leader (imam).’ Another (jurist) said, ‘No policy (siyasa) should be applied except what abides by shari’a. Ibn Aqil said, siyasa (which can be described as related to shari’a) represent actions that make people nearer to what is good and further from what is evil, even if such policies were not practiced by the Prophet or included in God’s revelation.’
Ibn al-Qayyim underlined the lack of true knowledge of shari’a and how it copes with the existing realities, and made this fascinating statement:
God only sent the conveyors of His message and sent down His revealed books so that people deal with one another with justice. Wherever a sign of truth appears, and an evidence of justice rises—by any way, there is God’s law and command. God has only indicated through the ways that he gave as laws [by revelation] that His purpose is to establish justice and to secure it in people’s behavior: and thus any way that makes the truth clear and justice recognized should be followed in ruling... We do not see that a just policy may differ from the comprehensive shari’a, but it is merely a part of shari’a, and calling it ‘policy, siyasa’ is merely a term, since it is just inseparable from shari’a. 41
The legislature, then, is necessary and legitimate in a modern Islamic state. It also watches the practices of the executive body, enquires about any failure and introduces any necessary legislation for reform. The principle of “checks and balances” would be helpful in organizing the state bodies and their powers, and guarding the public interest. The separation of the legislative and the executive in their functions, should allow channels of cooperation and should not create a climate of confrontation. The moral and spiritual dimension in the politics of an Islamic state may help organizationally and psychologically to develop the essential co-operation between the two branches. As for the judiciary, it should be independent and protected against any interference or pressure.
Contemporary mass communications provide a valuable vehicle for public information, education and expression. Talk shows, panel discussions, movies, series, songs and other entertainment programs also have their impact on the public attitudes in the various areas of life. I limit myself here to the political side.
Any established means of mass communication must be secured for all. This right may be organized, but never restricted. Freedom of searching for information from different sources including the governmental authorities should also be secured. Legal and ethical safeguards ought not to hinder creativity. The media can help the readers and the audience become more aware of the political issues, especially during election campaigns, and this would make them more capable of a right decision. Any new legislation or any public measure may be more successful in achieving its objective if it is preceded, combined and followed by information and education of the people through the media. According to the Quran, God’s guidance has to be clarified to a person before being responsible for a deliberate deviation from it [e.g., 4:115; 47:25, 33]. Those who are entrusted with authority
by the people have to respond to people’s questions about their practices, while the people have the responsibility to look for the information from the proper sources and avoid rumor traps by using their common sense and moral values [Quran 4:83; 49:6-8]. If any of the mass media is run by the government in a way or another, political parties and contestants for public offices should have equal opportunities to address the people.
However, rights go hand-in-hand with responsibilities. Modern technology has endowed the media, both within the country and universally, with a formidable power that ought to have ethical and legal safeguards. A universal document and supervision may be needed. Heavy pressures on the private media come from wealthy and influential contributors and advertisers. It is a real challenge for the modern world to benefit from this huge technical and psychological power and avoid its excessiveness and abuse. A combination of morality and creativity is essential in such a vital and sensitive area.

Conclusion

It may be obvious from this presentation that the modern democratic process can be a practical mechanism for securing human rights and dignity for all the children of Adam, implementing the concept of shura and achieving the goals and principles of shari’a in a modern Islamic state, with probably limited constitutional clarifications. The undesirable implication of democracy that “it puts the people’s will above God’s will” is merely theoretical, since democracy works within the dominant socio-cultural background, and Muslims will not accept a decision against their beliefs, as long as they are committed to those beliefs. Catholicism has been maintained in democratic Ireland, and monarchy has been maintained in democratic Britain, where the Queen is the head of the state and the church. Democracy acknowledges that natural human rights supersede any legislation, and in a parallel way, Muslims can always stress the supremacy of God’s guidance ideologically, legally and practically. If one may imagine that the majority of Muslims may turn against the political conduct of an Islamic state, this may be limited to certain practices or governmental terms, not to the Islamic state in principle, and the mechanism of a multi-party system can allow another Islamic party to offer a better experience. If, hypothetically, the majority do not want an Islamic state, how can it be imposed on or defended against its will by a non-democratic government? Setting democracy in opposition to Islam is unfair for both. However, let us deal with a concrete, political democratic process and not talk about theories and hypotheses.
One should never assume in any way that Muslims who criticize an Islamic leader, party, government, or even state have become non-Muslims or against Islam! Islam is a faith, not a mere political system, and it has won supporters and followers by exhortation and conviction through individual and social behavior and through its civilization. The message of Islam is always to convince not to impose [e.g., Quran 2:256, 10:99, 11:28, 16:125].
As Muslims should not develop hypothetical and unrealistic fears about a democratic process to implement shura in a contemporary Islamic state, non-Muslims should not have unsubstantial fears about Islam, since it is an ideological and moral safeguard for justice and equal human rights because the Islamic faith deepens the Muslims’ commitment to the human dignity for all the children of Adam. No human rights secured by democracy would be hurt by Islam or Muslims, but would be more observed as a matter of faith.
What about violent militancy or militant violence that we hear about among some Muslims? I see that a blocking of democratic channels of expression and assembly leads in many cases to explosion. In a democracy, there is no place for violence, and Islamic activism can always present itself through common sense and moral behavior. Violence is used only by those who are initially unable to offer words or deeds, or by those who are suppressed by restrictions and pressures and thus it is impossible for them to do so. Muslims in remote and isolated areas in Africa and Asia have proved through centuries that they can peacefully cohabitate with others, and can peacefully present their message through their words and deeds.
Notes
1 Encyclopedia Britannica, volume 9, s.v. “Ideology.”
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 New Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, s.v “Democracy.”
5 Thomas L. Pangle, The Ennobling of Democracy: The Challenge of the Postmodern Age (Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1992).
6 Pangle pp. 2-4, 71, 84, 87-90.
7 Aslam Munjee, The Rape of a Noble Ideology: U.S.A. in Perspective 1783-1985 (Hercules, CA: First Amendment Publishers, 1986).
8 A.H. Somjee, The Democratic Process in a Developing Society (London: Macmillan, 1979).
9 Somjee, p. vii-viii, 144.
10 Somjee, p. 151.
11 For example, see e.g. Quran 2:176, 213; and 30:8
12 Quran 30:30
13 John Dewey, Individualism: Old and New (New York: Minton & Batch, 1930; Arabic translation by Kyayri Hammad, al-Fardiyya Qadiman wa Hadithan, Beirut: al Hayat Publications, 1960), p. 10-18
14 Quran 59:23
15 Quran 42:11
16 Quran 112:4
17 Ibn ‘Abd al-Hakan, Abd al-Rahman ibn ‘Abd Allah, Futuh Misr wa-l-Maghrib, ed. by Abd al-Manim Amir, Cairo: Ministry of Culture, 1961, p.224-6.
18 Quran 17:70
19 Quran 21:23
20 Quran 2:256
21 Quran 42:38
22 Quran 22:41, 3:104, 110.
23 Quran 2:233
24 Quran 31:17
25 Quran 3:159
26 Ibn >Atiyya, Abd al-Haqq ibn Ghalib, al-Muharrar al-Wajiz, vol. III. (Fez: Ministry of Awqafand Islamic Affairs, 1997), p. 280-281.
27 Muhammad Abduh and Muhammad Rashid Rida, Tafsir al-Quran al-Hakim (Tafsir al-Manar) (Cairo: Matba’at Subayh, 1374 H., V. IV) p. 199-200 (commentary on the verse 3:159).
28 Quran 4:59
29 Abu Ya’la, Muhammad ibn al-Husayn al-Farra, [d. 458 H/1065 C.E.], al-Mu’tamadfi Usul al-Din, a chapter published in Yusuf Ibish, Nusus al-Fikr al-Siyasi al-Islami (Beirut: Dar al-Tali’a, 1966) p. 224.
30 See Tafsir al-Manar, ibid, V. IV p. 200-202.

31 Quran 9:71

32 Ibn Kathir, lsma’il ibn ’Umar, al-Bidaya wa-l-Nihaya, ed. by Ahmad abu Milhim and others. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al Ilmiyya, 1988, V. VII p. 151.
33 Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad, Bidayat al-Mujtahid, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, n.d., vol II, p. 384; Ibn Hazm, Ali ibn Ahmad, al-Muhalla, ed. Muhammad Khalil al-Harras. Cairo: Matba’at al-Imam, n.d., vol. IX, p. 523-4.
34 See Ibn Rushd, ibid., vol. II, p. 348.
35 A hadith (tradition) reported by Ibn Hanbal, al-Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud and al-Nisa’i.
36 Quran 9:71.
37 al-Mawardi, Ali ibn Muhammad, al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyya, Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi Publications, Cairo: 1973, p. 27.
38 Quran 3:113, 5:66, 5:108, 7:38, 7:159, 7:164, 28:23.
39 Quran 4:59.
40 Amin, Ahmad, Duha al-Islam. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi, n.d., vol. I, p. 208 et seq; vol II, p. 174.
41 Ibn al-Qayyim, Muhammad ibn >Abi Baker, I’lam al-Muwaqq’in, ed, ‘Abd al-Ra’uf Saa’d. Beirut: n.d., vol. IV, p. 37; al-Turuq al-Hukmiyya, ed, Muhammad Hamid al-Faqi, Cairo: n.d., p. 35.

Therefore, Islam can be presented to and dealt with by a non-Muslim as an ideology, with some flexibility in using the term since it was coined for human ideas, or as general principles for a comprehensive way of life. Naturally, however, the intellectual conviction cannot provide the same moral depth, width and constancy as a religious commitment, which looks for the acceptance of the Absolute Supreme and the reward of eternity. Freedom and equality for all human beings are, for the believers in God, definite results of the belief in the One who is the only distinctive and supreme “the One to whom all greatness belongs,”14 “there is nothing like unto him,”15 “there is nothing that could be compared with Him.” 16 All human beings are equally God’s creation, and each is free since he or she is only subject to God’s physical and moral laws, and each is equal to any other human being. Caliph ‘Umar (13-23H/634-44 C.E.) tersely addressed the Muslim governor of Egypt whose son beat an Egyptian child, “Since when did you impose slavery on human beings while their mothers bore them free!” 17
He argues that a serious challenge has been posed to postmodernism by the emerging democracies of Eastern Europe which make demands on Western thought that post-modernism has been unable to meet6. Along a similar line, Aslam Munjee has written The Rape of a Noble Ideology: U.S.A. in Perspective 1783-1985. 7
Islam is a religion, not a mere political system; it appeals primarily to the inwardness of the human mind and spirit, the promises the whole fulfillment of every individual and absolute justice in the eternal life to come. However, it requires that the individual's spiritual development be represented and reflected in reforming personal behavior and social relations, in order to prove innate change and achieve salvation with its eternal rewards. Islam not only has a vision of a just society, but also presents general principles of a whole way of life for the individual, the family, the society, the state, and the world relations in order to secure balance and justice in the whole human sphere. It offers the basic moral and organization rules for relations between man and woman, between the elderly and the young in the nuclear and extended family, and in the society, between the haves and the have-nots, between the rulers and the ruled, and between Muslims and others within the local society and throughout the world. Like ideologies, Islam does not provide detailed practicalities and programs, since such details are changeable to fit unceasing change in human circumstances in different times and places. Islam allows extensive room for the creativity of the human mind to cope with emerging changes, for the human mind is God's gift to be fully used and developed, it should not be restricted or crippled by that other gift of God, His guiding messages. It is the same One God who created the human being, and who grants him or her spiritual, moral, and intellectual faculties, and to whom He has sent His guiding messages as well, both are made in accordance with the all truth. 11 Thus, no contradiction between both may exist; “And so set your face (and direct yourself) sincerely towards the faith, which is in accordance with the nature upon which God has originated human beings...”12 God’s messages aim to develop the human being in his or her totality: spiritually, morally, intellectually, physically, individually and socially, and to guard him or her against egotism without suppressing or pattemizing human individuality and personal creativity. Divine guidance develops individuals through to their full spiritual potential instead of being deformed by selfish greed in a material civilization—as the American philosopher John Dewey has sharply pointed out.13